Astronomer Hugh Ross & Biologist Stephen Myers

    Reasons to BelieveAstronomer

Hugh Norman Ross (born July 24, 1945) is an Canadian American astrophysicist, Christian apologist, and old earth creationist.

Ross has a Ph.D. in astrophysics from the University of Toronto and an undergraduate degree in physics from the Univesity of British Columbia. He is known for establishing his own ministry called ==> Reasons to Believe that promotes progressive and day-age forms of Old Earth Creationism. Ross accepts the scientific age of the earth and the scientific age of the universe, however he rejects evolution and abiogenesis as explanations for the history and origin of life.

==> Why The Universe Is The Way It Is

Hugh Ross on why Evolution cannot produce Species

================================================

———————————————————————–

To those who would like to learn about the historical issues surrounding the contemporary debates which revolve around Science and Religion click here ==> Science and Religion.

———————

Biologist Stephen Myer

Discovery Institute

     Discovery Institute

Stephen C. Meyer (born 1958) is an advocate for intellegent design. He helped found the Center for Science and Culture (CSC) of ==> the Discovery Institute (DI), which is the main organization behind the intelligent design movemeent Before joining the DI, Meyer was a professor at Whitworth College. Meyer is currently director at the Discovery Institute’s Center for Science and Culture and Senior Fellow at the DI.

                             ==> Darwin’s Doubt page.

 

Stephen Myer

        Darwinism’s Flaw 

—————————-

==> Darwin’s Doubt Blurb <==

The You Tube Below Features CSPAN’s BookTV Interviews Dr. Stephen Meyer on Darwin’s Doubt 

 

============================

For those interested you can see more of Dr. Myers from the Darwin’s Doubt page hot linked above.

——————

We would also like to also suggest our Dr. James Tour page for all interested parties. Dr. Tour is a prominent synthetic chemist and a leading innovator in the science of nanotechnology.

——-

2 Comments

  • Mark commented on March 24, 2023 Reply

    Two of the best exposing bad science. Thanks for your insight and courage

    Thank you, very much. With Blessings.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *